![]() DNA testing and kinship: Paternity, genealogy and the search for the “truth” of our genetic origins. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 25: 193–203.įreeman, T., and M. Donor insemination families: A follow-up study of disclosure decisions, family relationships and child adjustment at adolescence. Santiago: The Universidad Diego Portales.įreeman, T., and S. El proceso de revelar los origenes en familias creadas mediante donacion de semen: perspectivas de padres e hijos durante la adolescencia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.įreeman, T. In Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities, ed. Psychological adjustment among children conceived via donor insemination by lesbian and heterosexual mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 77: 38–48.Ĭhan, R.W., B. Child adjustment and parenting in planned lesbian-parent families. Genes r us? Making sense of genetic and non-genetic relationships following anonymous donor insemination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īlyth, Eric. Families created by assisted reproduction: Children’s perspectives. “Daddy ran out of tadpoles”: How parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand. Journal of Early Adolescence 11(1): 56–95.īlake, L., P. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īaumrind, D. Is disclosure in the best interests of children conceived by donation? In Reproductive donation: Practices, policies and bioethics, ed. ![]() In particular, the paper argues for a cautious approach to applying psychosocial evidence to ethical issues that is sensitive to the caveats and nuances of research findings and the changing cultural and regulatory context.Īppleby, J.B., L. Whilst this paper starts from the premise that psychosocial data has a vital role in grounding normative discussions, it seeks to contribute to this dialogue by highlighting both the value and limitations of social science research. By drawing together research findings that may be pertinent to the regulation of gamete donation and information sharing, a further aim of this paper is to explore the potential use and misuse of empirical ‘evidence’ in ethical and policy debates. The paper illustrates how these concerns are framed by ideas about the significance-or not-of ‘genetic relatedness’ ideas which have come to the fore in contemporary discussions about the potential consequences of donor-conceived individuals gaining access to their donor’s identity. The paper identifies three core sets of empirical, ethical and policy concerns underpinning these debates relating to (i) the psychosocial impact of gamete donation per se on child wellbeing, (ii) the psychosocial impact of parental disclosure decisions on child wellbeing, and (iii) the psychosocial implications of donor identification for donor-conceived offspring. In particular, the paper addresses current regulatory debates concerning information sharing and the best interests of the child by considering psychosocial aspects of telling-or not telling-children about their donor conception and the identity of their donor. This paper overviews key empirical findings from social science research regarding the impact of gamete donation on child wellbeing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |